Effective treatment for frozen shoulder

Activity- versus structural-oriented treatment approach for frozen shoulder: a randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary]
Horst R, Maicki T, Trabka R, Albrecht S, Schmidt K, Metel S, von Piekartz H
Clinical Rehabilitation 2017 May;31(5):686-695
clinical trial

OBJECTIVE: To compare the short- and long-term effects of a structural-oriented (convential) with an activity-oriented physiotherapeutic treatment in patients with frozen shoulder. 
SUBJECTS: We included patients diagnosed with a limited range of motion and pain in the shoulder region, who had received a prescription for physiotherapy treatment, without additional symptoms of dizziness, a case history of headaches, pain and/or limited range of motion in the cervical spine and/or temporomandibular joint.
INTERVENTIONS: The study group received treatment during the performance of activities. The comparison group was treated with manual therapy and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (conventional therapy). Both groups received 10days of therapy, 30minutes each day.
MAIN MEASURES: Range of motion, muscle function tests, McGill pain questionnaire and modified Upper Extremity Motor Activity Log were measured at baseline, after two weeks of intervention and after a three-month follow-up period without therapy.
​RESULTS: A total of 66 patients were randomized into two groups: The activity-oriented group (n = 33, mean 44years, SD 16years) including 20 male (61%) and the structural-oriented group (n = 33, mean 47years, SD 17years) including 21 male (64%). The activity-oriented group revealed significantly greater improvements in the performance of daily life activities and functional and structural tests compared with the group treated with conventional therapy after 10days of therapy and at the three-month follow-up (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Therapy based on performing activities seems to be more effective for pain reduction and the ability to perform daily life activities than conventional treatment methods.